By Brenda Norrell
Why does Navajo Times have this article, 'Groundbreaking, Hawaiian blessing for telescope' -- instead of an article about the Native Hawaiian protest over the telescope desecrating the sacred mountain Mauna Kea? http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2014/10/native-hawaiians-protest-telescope-on.html
Navajo Times posted an AP article on this serious issue of desecrating the sacred mountain. As usual, AP is promoting the government and corporate interests instead of Indigenous rights and protection of Mauna Kea. By reposting AP's US and corporate spin, Navajo Times becomes part of the violation of the sacred mountain.
I was looking at Navajo Times to see if they covered the Dine' women who were featured in Rolling Stone and on Democracy Now at Flood Wall Street in New York. I don't see anything about Navajos at Flood Wall Street or the Climate March in New York. But I do see that Navajo Times has a non-Indian reporter covering the Longest Walk and prison camp, 'Hwéeldi at 150.'
Why is this? There are so many unemployed Navajo and Native American reporters, why does Navajo Times continue to employ non-Indian reporters? Besides the ethics of this, it is a violation of Navajo Preference in Employment law.
The Dine' women at Flood Wall Street and the Climate March in New York in September took a bold stand against the dirty coal industry and the violators in their homeland: Peabody Coal and dirty coal-fired power plants.
Is Navajo Times censoring the fact that the Navajo Generating Station, on the Navajo Nation, is one of the top polluters in the world? It is easy to fill a newspaper with political turmoil, a good way to distract readers from what is really happening as a result of the dirty coal power plants on the Navajo Nation.
Update: Protesters halt telescope groundbreaking
Wednesday, October 8, 2014
In the news today: Navajo Times
Posted by email@example.com at 9:28 AM